PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MTBA vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


MTBA^GSPC
YTD Return4.30%17.79%
Daily Std Dev4.72%12.69%
Max Drawdown-2.55%-56.78%
Current Drawdown-0.21%-0.86%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between MTBA and ^GSPC is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

MTBA vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MTBA achieves a 4.30% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 17.79% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
4.82%
7.53%
MTBA
^GSPC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MTBA vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MTBA
Sharpe ratio
No data
^GSPC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 2.06, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.06
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 2.78, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.78
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.37
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 1.85, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.85
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 11.09, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0011.09

MTBA vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Drawdowns

MTBA vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTBA drawdown since its inception was -2.55%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTBA and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-0.21%
-0.86%
MTBA
^GSPC

Volatility

MTBA vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) is 0.62%, while S&P 500 (^GSPC) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that MTBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
0.62%
3.99%
MTBA
^GSPC